From fd03d9b2dc11165eee75ded75bea4d2e99e8ea5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: wetzels <wetzels@rhrk.uni-kl.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 14:54:01 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] More precise task description for Exercise 5.

---
 ex5/README.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/ex5/README.md b/ex5/README.md
index 93a3dbf..89638cc 100644
--- a/ex5/README.md
+++ b/ex5/README.md
@@ -69,4 +69,4 @@ To do this, create a `vtkContourFilter` and add it to your visualization.
 You can compare your results with the `sphere.vtk` and the `cube.vtk`. Those examples should look the same, however, this may not always be the case. Why?
 *Hint: Check the scalar ranges of the datasets to make sure that your isosurface is in a valid range.*
 
-**Summary of Tasks:** Implement a `vtkContourFilter` and compare it to your own implementation. Why could Marching Tetrahedra and Marching Cubes differ? Save your submission code as `task3.py`. Please explain how to do the comparison in comments in your code.
+**Summary of Tasks:** Implement a `vtkContourFilter` and compare it to your own implementation. Why could Marching Tetrahedra and Marching Cubes differ? Put your answer into the designated field below. For the code, save your submission as `task3.py`. Please explain how to do the comparison in comments in your code.
-- 
GitLab